United States v. Approximately $9,500.00 in U.S. Currency, No. 1:2009cv01349 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE dated *6/3/2010* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/2/2010. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
United States v. Approximately $9,500.00 in U.S. Currency 1 5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 6 Doc. 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 1:09-CV-01349-LJO-GSA ) Plaintiff, ) FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE ) v. ) ) APPROXIMATELY $9,500.00 IN U.S. ) CURRENCY, ) ) Defendant. ) _____________________________________) 17 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court finds: 18 1. 19 This is a civil forfeiture action against defendant approximately $9,500.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant currency”). 20 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was filed on July 31, 2009, seeking the 21 forfeiture of the defendant currency, alleging the currency constitutes moneys or other things of value 22 furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance or listed chemical, all 23 proceeds traceable to such an exchange and/or was used or intended to be used to facilitate one or 24 more violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841 et seq., and is subject to forfeiture to the United States of 25 America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). 26 3. On August 3, 2009, in accordance with the Complaint, a Warrant for Arrest of 27 Articles In Rem for the defendant currency was issued and duly executed on August 6, 2009. 28 /// FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE Dockets.Justia.com 1 4. Beginning on August 6, 2009, for at least 30 consecutive days, the United States 2 published notice of the forfeiture action on the official internet government forfeiture site 3 www.forfeiture.gov. A Declaration of Publication was filed on October 16, 2009. 4 5. In addition to the public notice of forfeiture having been completed, actual notice was 5 personally served upon Navy Riel and Malay Phita Riel. To date, only Navy Riel has filed a claim 6 and answer to this action. No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter, and the time 7 for which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. 8 9 6. Claimant Navy Riel and potential claimant Malay Phita Riel represent and warrant that they are the sole owners of the defendant currency. 10 Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby 11 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 12 1. 13 14 15 16 The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action. 2. Judgment is hereby entered against Navy Riel, Malay Phita Riel, and all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action. 3. Upon entry of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture, $4,750.00 of the defendant 17 approximately $9,500.00 in U.S. Currency, together with any interest that may have accrued on the 18 whole amount of the defendant currency, shall be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 19 § 881(a)(6), to be disposed of according to law. 20 4. Upon entry of a Final Judgment of Forfeiture herein, but no later than 45 days 21 thereafter, $4,750.00 of the defendant approximately $9,500.00 in U.S. Currency shall be returned 22 to claimant Navy Riel through his attorney Anthony P. Capozzi, 1233 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 102, 23 Fresno, California 93711, (559) 221-0200. 24 5. Plaintiff United States of America and its servants, agents, and employees, and all 25 other public entities, their servants, agents, and employees, are released from any and all liability 26 arising out of or in any way connected with the arrest, seizure, or forfeiture of the defendant 27 currency. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and unanticipated injuries, and/or 28 damages arising out of said arrest, seizure, or forfeiture, as well as to those now known or disclosed. FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 2 1 The parties to this stipulation agree to waive the provisions of California Civil Code § 1542. 2 3 6. all claim or right to interest that may have accrued on the defendant currency, or any portion thereof. 4 5 Claimant Navy Riel and potential claimant Malay Phita Riel hereby waive any and 7. There was reasonable cause for the seizure and arrest of the defendant currency and that the Court may enter a Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 6 8. All parties will bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 7 8 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE 9 Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem filed July 31, 10 2009, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters this 11 Certificate of Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for 12 seizure of the defendant currency. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: b9ed48 June 2, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.