(PC) Robles v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al, No. 1:2009cv01279 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 17 plaintiff's renewed Motion to Remand signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/2/2010. (Vasquez, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Robles v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JORGE SALAZAR ROBLES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 1:09-cv-01279-AWI-GBC PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. 23) 13 MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR REMAND 14 Defendants. 15 (Doc. 17) / 16 17 18 I. Procedural History Jorge Salazar Robles (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 19 rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s request for 21 remand, and he filed an amended complaint and renewed motion to remand on March 31, 2010. 22 (Docs. 16, 17.) 23 On October 6, 2010, findings and recommendations were issued recommending that 24 Plaintiff’s renewed motion for remand be denied, granting Plaintiff thirty days to file an 25 objection. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff did not file an objection to the findings and recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 27 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 28 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 At this time, the Court will not remand the action. 2 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 3 1. 4 5 2010, are ADOPTED in full; and 2. 6 7 The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on October 6, Plaintiff’s renewed motion to remand, filed March 31, 2010, is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: 0m8i78 December 2, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.