(PC) Aquino v. Jones, No. 1:2009cv01001 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this 12 Action be Dismissed, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 02/08/2011. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 3/14/2011. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
(PC) Aquino v. Jones Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DORIAN AQUINO, 10 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01001-LJO-GBC PC Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM M. JONES, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY-DAYS 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Dorian Aquino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on June 8, 17 2009. On order was issued on December 20, 2010, dismissing the first amended complaint, with 18 leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). 19 Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this 20 action would be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims. More than thirty days have 21 passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, 22 there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted. 23 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY 24 RECOMMENDED that this action BE DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to 25 state any claims upon which relief may be granted. 26 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) 28 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 4 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: cm411 February 8, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.