(PC) Strong v. Elliot, No. 1:2009cv00583 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/29/2009 adopting 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 4 Motion for remand.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Strong v. Elliot Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE BERRY STRONG, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. KENNETH ELLIOT, 15 16 17 1:09-cv-00583-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 7.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND (Doc. 4.) Defendant. _____________________________/ George Berry Strong (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 20 On April 21, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 plaintiff's motion to remand this action to the Kings County Superior Court be denied. (Doc. 7.) 22 Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within 23 thirty days, and plaintiff requested and was granted an additional thirty days to file objections. 24 (Docs. 9, 10.) The final thirty day period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed objections or 25 otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73- 27 305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 21, 5 2009, are adopted in full; and 6 7 2. Plaintiff's motion to remand this action to the Kings County Superior Court is DENIED. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 July 29, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.