Palacios v. Fresno Superior Court et al, No. 1:2009cv00554 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DISMISSING Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/3/2009. Gary Austin; Tamara Beard; William Campbell; Fran Collins; David Kalamakarian; Terri LeFlore; Diana Monopoly; James Petrucelli; Fran Riley; Charles Soley; Brian Arax and James Ardaiz terminated. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
Palacios v. Fresno Superior Court et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GLORIA PALACIOS, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ) et al., ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1:09cv0554 OWW DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Document 16) ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 16 17 18 Plaintiff Gloria Palacios (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed the instant civil rights action on March 25, 2009. 19 On October 21, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that 20 that certain claims and certain Defendants be DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 21 The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any 22 objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. Over thirty (30) days have passed and 23 Plaintiff has not filed objections. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a 25 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 26 Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 FULL; 2. 5 6 The Findings and Recommendations dated October 21, 2009, is ADOPTED IN Plaintiff’s ADA, RA and section 1985(3) claims ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; and 3. Defendants Petrucelli, Kalemakarian, Austin, Arax, Gaab, Soley, Nytrom-Gist, 7 Ardaiz, Beard, Collins, Beckette, La Flori, Teresa Doe, Fran Riley, Sara 8 Campbell, D. Brengelman, Jane Doe, Sharon Doe, Diane Monopoly and Jane 9 Doe(2) ARE DISMISSED. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: December 3, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.