(PC) Glass v. Woodford et al, No. 1:2009cv00098 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 20 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/7/2010. M. Hodge-Wilkins, A. Olivas, C.K. Lawence, Poblete, J. Kim, Mason, Bill Lockyer, Billiou, A. Diaz, Robert Santos, J. S. Woodford, B. Silva, D.D. Shepp ard-Brooks, R.R. Lowden, S. Issac, S. Pina, J. Keener, D. Indendi, Warren, J.M. Gonzales, W. Hayward, Dehlert, F. Braswell, A. Trudillo, L.L. Wood, A.K. Scribner, L. Watson, D.D. Ortiz, V. Yamamoto, R. Lopez, R. Halberg, D. Combs, D - Matthews are DISMISSED from this action.(Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Glass v. Woodford et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DONALD GLASS, 10 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00098-OWW-SKO PC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. 20) 12 J.S. WOODFORD, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Donald Glass (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 17 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On March 24, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which 19 recommended that Defendants M. Hodge-Wilkins, A. Olivas, Lawence, Poblete, Kim, Mason, 20 Lockyer, Billiou, Diaz, Santos, Woodford, B. Silva, D. Sheppard-Brooks, R. Lowden, S. Issac, S. 21 Pina, Keener, Indendi, Warren, Gonzales, Hayward, Dehlert, Braswell, Trujillo, Wood, Scribner, 22 Watson, Ortiz, Yamamoto, Lopez, Halberg, Coombs, and D. Matthews be dismissed from this 23 action. (Doc. #20.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained 24 notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within 25 thirty (30) days of date on which they were served. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings 26 and Recommendations. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court 2 has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court 3 finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 5 1. The March 24, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; 6 2. Defendants M. Hodge-Wilkins, A. Olivas, Lawence, Poblete, Kim, Mason, Lockyer, 7 Billiou, Diaz, Santos, Woodford, B. Silva, D. Sheppard-Brooks, R. Lowden, S. Issac, 8 S. Pina, Keener, Indendi, Warren, Gonzales, Hayward, Dehlert, Braswell, Trujillo, 9 Wood, Scribner, Watson, Ortiz, Yamamoto, Lopez, Halberg, Coombs, and D. 10 11 Matthews are DISMISSED from this action; and 3. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s January 5, 2009 complaint against Defendants 12 Hamilton, Robles, Logue, Bautista, and John Doe for use of excessive force, against 13 Defendants Grandy, Riddle, and McDaniel for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s 14 medical needs, and against Defendants Hamilton, Bautista, Logue, Robles, Riddle, 15 Cedillos, Grandy, and McDaniel for retaliation. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: June 7, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.