Contreras v. Moreno et al, No. 1:2009cv00087 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 Findings and Recommendations, Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 04/15/2009. CASE CLOSED (Martin, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Contreras v. Moreno et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROCKY MEL CONTRERAS, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 ERNIE MORENO, et al., 13 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09cv0087 OWW DLB ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Document 14) 16 Plaintiff Rocky Mel Contreras, appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, filed 17 this civil rights and employment discrimination action on January 14, 2009. 18 On February 26, 2009, the Court issued Findings and Recommendation that the action be 19 dismissed without leave to amend for Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim for which relief can be 20 granted. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that 21 any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On March 2, 2009, Plaintiff indicated that 22 he had not received the Findings and Recommendations and he was given a courtesy copy from 23 the Clerk’s office. Over thirty (30) days have passed since the March 2, 2009, service and 24 Plaintiff has not filed objections. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a 26 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the 27 Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 The Findings and Recommendations dated February 26, 2009, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. The action is DISMISSED. This terminates this action in its entirety. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 15, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
