(HC) Fordjour v. Jordan, et al., No. 1:2009cv00060 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING Petitioners motions for immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance, issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief re: 6 & 7 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/20/2010. (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Fordjour v. Jordan, et al. Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHARLES FORDJOUR, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 14 v. KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF CHRIS JORDAN, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv—00060-OWW-SKO-HC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PETITIONER’S MOTIONS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, IMMEDIATE RELEASE, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (DOCS. 23, 6, 7) ) ) ) ) 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 ostensibly pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 21 referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) 22 and Local Rules 302 and 303. 23 The matter has been On June 29, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 24 recommendations that the Court deny Petitioner’s motions for 25 immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance, 26 issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief. 27 findings and recommendations were served on all parties. 28 August 10, 2010, Petitioner mailed untimely objections (Doc. 25, These On 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 4) that were filed in this Court on August 16, 2010. 2 has nevertheless considered the objections filed by Petitioner. 3 The Court In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 4 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 5 The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file and has 6 considered the objections; the undersigned has determined there 7 is no need to modify the findings and recommendations based on 8 the points raised in the objections. 9 report and recommendation is supported by the record and proper 10 The Court finds that the analysis. 11 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 12 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on June 29, 2010, 13 are ADOPTED in full; and 14 2. Petitioner’s motions for immediate release, immediate release on his own recognizance, issuance of an order to show cause, and injunctive relief are DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: August 20, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
