(PC) Rose v. State of California, No. 1:2008cv00681 - Document 37 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER Vacating 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/31/2011. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Rose v. State of California Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN W. ROSE, 12 13 Case No. 1:08-cv-00681 LJO JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS vs. (Doc. 35) 14 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 17 ________________________________/ 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In its screening order filed October 27, 2010, the Court instructed 20 Plaintiff to either file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the Court 21 or notify the Court in writing of his willingness to proceed on his procedural due process claim. 22 (Doc. 26.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s order. Accordingly, on March 18, 2011, the 23 Court issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for 24 Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. (Doc. 35.) 25 On March 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. 26 (Doc. 36.) Therein, Plaintiff indicates that he intended to notify the Court of his willingness to 27 proceed on his cognizable procedural due process claim, but he accidentally filed the notice in the 28 Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California. (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff requests that the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 undersigned vacate the March 18, 2011 findings and recommendations so that he may proceed on 2 his cognizable procedural due process claim. (Id.) 3 4 Good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the findings and recommendations filed March 18, 2011 (Doc. 35) are VACATED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: March 31, 2011 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
