UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Fredrickson, No. 1:2008cv00589 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER to the Clerk to Serve the 23 Findings and Recommendations Re Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment on Defendant; ORDER Extending Time for Filing Objections to No Later Than Thirty Days After the Date of Service of this Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/8/2009. Objections to F&R due by 2/12/2009. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Fredrickson Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 UMG RECORDINGS, et al., 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 LOUIS FREDRICKSON, 13 Defendant. 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-cv-00589-OWW-SMS ORDER TO THE CLERK TO SERVE THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DOC. 23) ON DEFENDANT ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING OBJECTIONS TO THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO NO LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding with a civil action in this Court. 18 The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-303. 20 On December 3, 2008, the undersigned Magistrate Judge filed 21 findings and recommendations that Plaintiffs’ motion for default 22 judgment be granted. However, the findings and recommendations 23 were not served on the Defendant. 24 Accordingly, it IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court serve 25 Defendant with the findings and recommendations by mailing a copy 26 of the document to Defendant Louis Fredrickson at 4696 N. Hughes, 27 Fresno, California 93705. 28 Further, the time within which Defendant Fredrickson may 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 file objections to the findings and recommendations is extended 2 to no later than thirty days after the date of service of this 3 order. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: icido3 6 January 8, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.