(PC) Uhlman v. Suryadevara et al, No. 1:2008cv00223 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 10 ; ORDER Dismissing Action, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim; ORDER for this Dismissal to Count as a Strike Pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/30/11. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Uhlman v. Suryadevara et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JACQUELYN UHLMAN, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, vs. SURYADEVARA, et al., 1:08-cv-00223-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 10.) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 13 Defendants. 14 ORDER FOR THIS DISMISSAL TO COUNT AS A STRIKE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 15 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 16 17 _____________________________/ Jacquelyn Uhlman (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 20, 2011, Findings and Recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 22 granted. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the Findings and 23 Recommendations within thirty days. To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise 24 responded to the Findings and Recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, 26 this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 20, 3 2011, are adopted in full; 4 5 2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; 6 3. This dismissal shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: 0m8i78 June 30, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
