(PC) Cade v. State of California et al, No. 1:2008cv00183 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/28/2009. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); Plaintiff is DIRECTED to Submit the $350 Filing Fee for This Action in Full. (Bradley, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Cade v. State of California et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 LAFAYETTE CADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:08 CV 00183 AWY YNP GSA (PC) ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Document # 12 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 18 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 19 Rule 72-302. 20 On September 23, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, 21 recommending that Plaintiff be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was 22 provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 25 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 27 proper analysis. 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on 3 September 23,2009, are adopted in full; and 4 5 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 6 3. Plaintiff is directed to submit, within thirty days of the date of service of this 7 order, the $350 filing fee for this action in full. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in dismissal 8 of this action pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 for failure to obey a court order. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 0m8i78 October 28, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
