(HC)Hanson v. Hubber, No. 1:2007cv01556 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 27 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING RESPONDENT'S 24 Motion to Dismiss, and DISMISSING Petition signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/16/2009. (Figueroa, O)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC)Hanson v. Hubber Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) SUE HUBBER, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ____________________________________) DENNIS RAY HANSON, 11 12 13 14 15 07-cv-1556 AWI WMW HC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING PETITION [Doc. 24, 27] 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2254 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 20 On November 6, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that 21 recommended the petition be denied as an unlawful second or successive petition. The Findings 22 and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any 23 objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No party 24 filed objections. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a 26 de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 27 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and 28 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Dockets.Justia.com 1 Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on November 6, 2008, are adopted in full; 3 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED; 5 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 6 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 0m8i78 January 16, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
