(PC) Ransom v. Martinez et al, No. 1:2007cv01511 - Document 34 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING Doe Defendants for Failure to Provide the United States Marshal With Sufficient Information to Effect Service of Process signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/5/2010. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Ransom v. Martinez et al Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 BRYAN E. RANSOM, 9 10 11 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01511-AWI-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING DOE DEFENDANTS FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS v. J. MARTINEZ, et al., 12 Defendants. (Doc. 28) 13 / 14 15 Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 17 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On October 8, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 19 which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the 20 Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely 21 Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 23 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 24 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 8, 2009, is adopted in full; and 27 2. John Doe Defendants 1 through 20, Floor Officer John Doe, MTA Jane Doe, LVN 28 Jane Doe, and R.N. Jane Doe are DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for Plaintiff’s failure to provide the United 2 States Marshal with information sufficient to effect timely service of the summons 3 and complaint. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 0m8i78 April 5, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.