(PC) Thomas v. Dept. Of Corrections et al, No. 1:2007cv01497 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and DISMISSING ACTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/08/2008. CASE CLOSED. (Arellano, S.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Thomas v. Dept. Of Corrections et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TECORA THOMAS, 12 1:07-cv-01497-LJO-GSA-P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5) Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, Tecora Thomas (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner 19 proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 20 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. The matter was referred to a 23 On December 11, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings 24 and a Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and 25 which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 26 Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) 27 days. 28 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections to the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2 § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a 3 de novo review of this case. 4 entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to 5 be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. 8 Having carefully reviewed the The Findings and Recommendation, filed December 11, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and, 9 2. This action is DISMISSED based on plaintiff’s failure 10 to obey the court’s order of October 25, 2007. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: b9ed48 February 8, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
