-BAM (PC) Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al, No. 1:2007cv01423 - Document 103 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 94 Findings and Recommendations and Denying 93 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/3/12. (Verduzco, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-BAM (PC) Braley v. Wasco State Prison, et al Doc. 103 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 THOMAS D. BRALEY, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01423-AWI-BAM ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A COURT ORDER v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., (ECF Nos. 93, 94 102) 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Thomas D. Braley (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 17 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On June 22, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations recommending 19 denying Plaintiff’s motion for a court order allowing library access and granting thirty days in which 20 to file any objections. (ECF No. 94.) Plaintiff filed objections to findings and recommendations on 21 July 13, 2012. (ECF No. 102.) 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 23 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings 24 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed June 22, 2012, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order for library access, filed June 20, 2012, is 4 5 DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: 0m8i78 August 3, 2012 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
