(PC) Hawthorne v. Mendoza-Power et al, No. 1:2007cv01101 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/22/2009 ADOPTING IN FULL 17 Findings and Recommendations; action to proceed against Defendants Mendoza-Powers and Henry; Defendants Rosemary Ndor, S.K. Pennywell, R. Braly and J DonDiago are dismissed for action for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Hawthorne v. Mendoza-Power et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RALPH KELLY HAWTHORNE JR, 10 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-1101-OWW-DLB PC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. 17). 12 KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Ralph Kelly Hawthorne (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 17 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 19 On October 7, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 20 which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the 21 Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely 22 Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 24 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 25 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 7, 2008, is adopted in full; 3 2. This action shall proceed only against defendants Mendoza-Powers and Henry; and 4 3. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Pennywell, J. DonDiago, Rosemary Ndor, and 5 R. Braly are dismissed for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be 6 granted. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: April 22, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.