(PC)Manson v. Smith et al, No. 1:2007cv00437 - Document 54 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 52 ; ORDER Granting Defendant Brar's Motion for Summary Judgment 40 ; ORDER Granting Summary Adjudication in Favor of Defendant Arvindra Brar, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/2/2010. Arvindra Brar terminated. (Verduzco, M)
Download PDF
(PC)Manson v. Smith et al Doc. 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HENRY MANSON III, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. DAVID G. SMITH, M.D., et al., 14 15 18 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 52.) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BRAR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 40.) Defendants. ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY ADJUDICATION IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT ARVINDRA BRAR 16 17 1:07-cv-00437-OWW-GSA-PC _____________________________/ Henry Manson III (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 20 to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On July 12, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 22 Defendant Brar's motion for summary judgment, filed on January 19, 2010, be granted. (Doc. 52.) 23 On August 12, 2010, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. 53.) 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court 25 has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including 26 Plaintiff's objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 27 and proper analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. 3 4 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 12, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. 5 The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Brar on January 19, 2010, is GRANTED; 6 3. Summary adjudication is entered in favor of Defendant Brar; 7 4. This action now proceeds only against Defendant David G. Smith, M.D.; and 8 5. The Clerk of Court shall reflect on the court's docket that only Defendant Smith 9 remains in this action. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: September 2, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2