(PC) Hunter v. Youngblood et al, No. 1:2007cv00373 - Document 46 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/21/2010 adopting 44 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 28 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief; denying 33 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief and to Appoint Counsel; and denying 36 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief.(Lundstrom, T)
Download PDF
(PC) Hunter v. Youngblood et al Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 U N IT ED ST A T ES D IST RICT COU RT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LEROY D. HUNTER, 10 CASE NO. 1:07-cv-00373-LJO-SKO PC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS FINDINGS AND v. (Doc. 44) 12 HINOJOSA, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Leroy D. Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 17 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On August 11, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which 19 recommended that Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief and appointment of counsel be denied. 20 (Doc. #44.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that 21 any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the 22 date on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. Neither party has filed objections 23 to the Findings and Recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court 25 has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court 26 finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. The August 11, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s January 6, 2010 motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED; 4 3. Plaintiff’s April 19, 2010 motion for preliminary injunctive relief and appointment 5 of counsel is DENIED; and 6 4. Plaintiff’s June 15, 2010 motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 66h44d September 21, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2