(PC) Howard v. Foreman, No. 1:2007cv00063 - Document 33 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, and DISMISSING Action for Failure to Obey a Court Order 31 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/4/09. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Howard v. Foreman Doc. 33 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) D R. FOREMAN, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) DARYL K. HOWARD, CASE NO: 1:07-CV-00063 LJO DLB P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. 31) 11 Plaintiff Daryl K. Howard, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 12 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 13 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 14 On December 9, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which 15 was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings 16 and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely objections 17 to the Findings and Recommendations. 18 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 19 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 20 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 9, 2008, is adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey the Court’s order of November 4, 2008.IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 Dated: b9ed48 February 4, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
