(PC) Chubbuck v. Hayden et al, No. 1:2006cv01810 - Document 64 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/9/2009 ADOPTING 63 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 44 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by David T Chubbuck. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
(PC) Chubbuck v. Hayden et al Doc. 64 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DAVID T. CHUBBUCK, 10 CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01810-OWW DLB PC Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF HAYDEN, et al., 13 (Doc. 63) Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff David T. Chubbuck, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has 17 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 18 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 19 On December 23, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 20 which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 21 Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely 22 objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 24 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 25 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 23, 2008, is adopted in full; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed March 3, 2008, is DENIED 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: February 9, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.