-GSA (PC) K'napp v. Adams et al, No. 1:2006cv01701 - Document 86 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 75 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING 66 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/18/2011. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
-GSA (PC) K'napp v. Adams et al Doc. 86 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 75.) vs. D. G. ADAMS, et al., 15 16 1:06-cv-01701-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 66.) Defendants. _______________________________/ 17 Eric Charles Rodney K'napp ("Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to 19 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 23, 2011, Findings and Recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed on February 25, 2011, be denied. On July 22, 22 2011, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, 23 24 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 25 including Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported 26 by the record and proper analysis. 27 /// 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on May 23, 3 2011, are ADOPTED in full; and 4 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed on February 25, 2011, is 5 DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 August 18, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.