(PC) Quiroz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al, No. 1:2006cv01426 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING in FULL the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 and DISMISSING Defendant Kazi From Action, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 8/13/09: Defendant Kazi is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Quiroz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CARLOS QUIROZ, 9 CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01426 OWW DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT KAZI FROM ACTION 10 vs. 11 12 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 13 (Doc. 24) Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff Carlos Quiroz, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 17 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 19 On June 18, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was 20 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and 21 Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The parties have not filed timely objections to 22 the Findings and Recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 24 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 25 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 18, 2009 is adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendant Kazi is dismissed from this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal 4 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: August 13, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.