(PC) Houston v. Schwarzenegger et al, No. 1:2006cv01318 - Document 40 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 33 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING 28 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER (Plaintiff's IFP status is REVOKED)Requiring Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee, in the amount of $ 350.00 within thirty days of thi order's date of service; Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to pay the filing fee will result in this actionsdismissal, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/09/2010. (Martin, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Houston v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) ) A. SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________) ROYCE KEVIN HOUSTON, 1:06-CV-1318 AWI YNP SMS ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE (Document #28 & #33) 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who is a proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 23, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations, 22 recommending that the court deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss but order Plaintiff to pay the 23 filing fee for this action. The Findings and Recommendations gave notice that any party could 24 file objections within thirty days. On December 14, 2009, Plaintiff filed objections. On 25 January 19, 2009, Plaintiff filed a supplement to his objections. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)C) this court has conducted a 27 de novo review of this case. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 28 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the Findings and Dockets.Justia.com 1 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. 4 The Findings and Recommendations filed October 23, 2009, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 5 2. Plaintiff’s IFP status is REVOKED; 6 3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED; 7 4. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the remaining balance of the $350.00 filing fee 8 9 within thirty days of this order’s date of service; and 5. 10 Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to pay the filing fee will result in this action’s dismissal. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: 0m8i78 February 9, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
