(PC) Ackley v. Carroll et al, No. 1:2006cv00771 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: {VACATED PURSUANT TO ORDER 15 }FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this 1 Action be DISMISSED for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge William M. Wunderlich on 1/16/2009. Matter referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Objections to F&R due by 2/23/2009) (Figueroa, O)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Ackley v. Carroll et al Doc. 10 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 DONALD J. ACKLEY, 7 Plaintiff, 8 1: 06 CV 0771 AWI WMW PC vs. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 9 10 D. CARROLL, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15 § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 16 § 636(b)(1). 17 By order filed December 11, 2008, the court issued an order dismissing the operative 18 complaint for failure to state a claim as to certain defendants and and directing Plaintiff to notify 19 the court within thirty days regarding his intention to proceed against the remaining defendants. 20 On December 31, 2008, Plaintiff filed a document titled as a written notification of his intention 21 to proceed against defendants Carroll, Blevin, Wright and Uribe. 22 In the December 11, 2008, order the court informed Plaintiff of the deficiencies in his 23 complaint regarding the remaining defendants, and dismissed the complaint on the ground that 24 Plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted as to those defendants. 25 Because Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, the court recommends dismissal of the 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 claims as to those defendants. See Noll v. Carlson, 809 F. 2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987) 2 (prisoner must be given notice of deficiencies and opportunity to amend prior to dismissing for 3 failure to state a claim). 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendants Andrews, Stockman, 5 Robicheaux, Gill,Finley, Denney, Scribner, Lopez, Busby, Grannis, Andrews, Watson and Allen 6 be dismissed, and Plaintiff’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief be dismissed. 7 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 8 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty days 9 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 10 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 11 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 12 shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised 13 that failure to file objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s 14 findings of fact. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file 15 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 16 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 17 18 19 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 21 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Within 22 twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 23 written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 24 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 25 objections within the specified time waives all objections to the judge’s findings of fact. See 26 2 1 Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: January 16, 2009 mmkd34 /s/ William M. Wunderlich UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
