-DLB (PC) Ransom v. Scribner, et al., No. 1:2006cv00208 - Document 92 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 81 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and ORDER DENYING 57 and 68 Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/28/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
-DLB (PC) Ransom v. Scribner, et al. Doc. 92 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRYAN E. RANSOM, 11 12 13 CASE NO. 1:06-CV-00208-LJO-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. A. K. SCRIBNER, et al., (DOC. 81) 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom (“plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2010 and November 24, 2010, 19 Plaintiff filed motions for temporary restraining orders, which the Court construed as motions for 20 preliminary injunction. Docs. 57, 68. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On January 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was 23 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and 24 Recommendations was to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party filed a timely Objection 25 to the Findings and Recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 28 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 14, 2011, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction, filed August 9, 2010, and November 4 24, 2010, are DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 February 28, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.