(PC) Ransom v. Scribner, et al., No. 1:2006cv00208 - Document 50 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 49 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and DISMISSING Defendants Munoz; Williams; Kaylor and Luna From Action, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/17/2009. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Ransom v. Scribner, et al. Doc. 50 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 BRYAN E. RANSOM, 5 CASE NO. 1:06-cv-00208 LJO DLB PC Plaintiff, 6 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING DEFENDANTS LUNA, KAYLOR, WILLIAMS AND MUNOZ FROM ACTION vs. 7 A.K. SCRIBNER, et al., (Doc. 49) 8 Defendants. 9 / 10 11 Plaintiff Bryan E. Ransom, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed 12 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 13 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 14 On July 7, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was 15 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and 16 Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. The parties have not filed timely objections to 17 the Findings and Recommendations. 18 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 19 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 20 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 7, 2009, is adopted in full; 23 2. Defendants Luna, Kaylor, Williams and Munoz are dismissed from this action without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: b9ed48 August 17, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.