Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Norton et al, No. 1:2005cv01207 - Document 873 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT dated *9/23/2009* signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 9/23/2009. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that final judgment is entered (1) in favor of Plaintiffs on their first claim for relief; (2) in favor of the Federal Defendants, Defendant-Intervenors, and Joined Parties on Plaintiffs second claim for relief; and (3) in favor of Federal Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors on Plaintiffs third claim for relief. (Jessen, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., 11 Case No. 1:05-cv-01207 OWW-GSA FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. SAN LUIS & DELTA MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY; et al., Defendant-Intervenors. ANDERSON-COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT; et al., Joined Parties. 20 21 In accordance with: (1) the June 1, 2007 order (Doc. 337) granting in part and denying in 22 part Natural Resources Defense Council, et al.’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion for summary judgment on 23 their first claim for relief; (2) the January 23, 2008 order (Doc. 567) granting San Luis & Delta 24 Mendota Water Authority’s (“Defendant-Intervenors”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ third claim 25 for relief; and (3) the September 1, 2009 order (Doc. 870), granting Dirk Kempthorne, et al.’s 26 (“Federal Defendants”), Defendant-Intervenors’, and Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District’s 27 (“Joined Parties”) motions for summary judgment, and denying Plaintiffs’ motion for summary 28 judgment as to Plaintiffs’ second claim for relief, [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT -1- 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that final judgment is entered (1) in favor of Plaintiffs on 2 their first claim for relief; (2) in favor of the Federal Defendants, Defendant-Intervenors, and 3 Joined Parties on Plaintiffs’ second claim for relief; and (3) in favor of Federal Defendants and 4 Defendant-Intervenors on Plaintiffs’ third claim for relief. 5 The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: _September 23, 2009 11 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
