Moore, et al. v. County of Kern, et al., No. 1:2005cv01115 - Document 219 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER Resetting Deadline for Objections to Findings and Recommendations to September 9, 2009 218 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/1/09: Objections to F&R regarding Bryce Moore's Settlement are to be filed on or by September 9, 2009. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
Moore, et al. v. County of Kern, et al. Doc. 219 1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF KERN, et. al, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________) ) AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS ) ____________________________________) JAMES W. MOORE, JR., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad litem, ALICIA MOORE, individually and as successor in interest of James W. Moore, deceased, et. al, 1:05-CV-1115 AWI SMS (Consolidated with: CV F 06-0120 OWW SMS) ORDER RESETTING DEADLINE FOR OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 14 15 16 On August 25, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation on 17 Plaintiff Bryce Moore’s petition for approval of compromise (“the Settlement”). See Court’s 18 Docket Doc. No. 218. The docket entry indicates that objections to the Findings and 19 Recommendation are due on or by September 11, 2009. See id. Upon review of the docket and 20 the Findings and Recommendation, the Court believes that it is appropriate to move forward the 21 deadline for objections. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any objections to the Findings and 23 Recommendation regarding Bryce Moore’s Settlement are to be filed on or by September 9, 24 2009.1 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: 0m8i78 September 1, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1 If Defendants do not intend to file objections, they are encouraged to file a notice of nonopposition prior to September 9, 2009. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.