(PC) Gudino v. Adams, et al., No. 1:2005cv00954 - Document 33 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 32 Motion for Extension To File Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/29/2010. (Objections to F&R due by 8/3/2010) (Marrujo, C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Gudino v. Adams, et al. Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SABINO NUNEZ GUDINO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 1:05-cv-00954 LJO SKO (PC) ORDER GRANTING FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS B.C. ADAMS, et al., (Motion#32) 15 Defendants. 16 ________________________________/ 30-DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. On June 25, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file objections to findings 19 and recommendations. Plaintiff has offered no explanation as to why he is unable to submit 20 objections on time. However, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for an extension. Plaintiff 21 is advised that any future request for an extension of time must be accompanied by a 22 demonstration that good cause exists to justify an extension of time. Accordingly, IT IS 23 HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file 25 his objections to the findings and recommendations. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: 0mee June 29, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
