(PC) Holmes v. Scribner, No. 1:2005cv00825 - Document 34 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER VACATING 32 Findings and Recommendations of July 23, 2009; ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint; ORDER DENYING Request for Court Appointed Legal Assistance signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/18/2009. ( Amended Complaint due by 10/19/2009) (Figueroa, O)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Holmes v. Scribner Doc. 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 ERIC HOLMES, 1:05-cv-00825-LJO-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF JULY 23, 2009 (Doc. 32.) 11 12 vs. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 14 15 A. K. SCRIBNER, et al., ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR COURT-APPOINTED LEGAL ASSISTANCE Defendants. 16 THIRTY DAY DEADLINE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 / 18 19 Eric Holmes ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 23, 2009, the 21 undersigned issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Plaintiff’s case for failure to 22 state a claim upon which relief may be granted, based on Plaintiff's failure to timely file a 23 Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 32.) On August 27, 2009, Plaintiff filed objections to 24 the findings and recommendations and requested court-appointed legal assistance. (Doc. 25 33.) Plaintiff asserts that he is legally blind and cannot see, read, or understand documents. 26 Plaintiff states that he failed to file the Second Amended Complaint because there was a 27 lockdown at the prison from July 10, 2009 to August 12, 2009. He states that he is still 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 waiting to go to the law library to do research and obtain copies. Plaintiff submits evidence 2 that he has limited vision. For these reasons, Plaintiff requests legal assistance and 3 additional time to file the Second Amended Complaint. 4 Regardless of Plaintiff’s poor vision and difficulty understanding court documents, 5 this court cannot require an attorney to represent Plaintiff. Mallard v. United States District 6 Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional 7 circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 8 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991). Without a 9 reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, this court will seek volunteer 10 counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. “A finding of exceptional 11 circumstances requires an evaluation of both ‘the likelihood of success of the merits and the 12 ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal 13 issues involved.’” Terrell, 935 F.2d at 1017 (citations omitted). In the present case, the 14 court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Even if it is assumed that 15 Plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that he has made serious allegations which, if 16 proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. This court is faced with 17 similar cases almost daily. Moreover, at this stage in the proceedings, the court cannot make 18 a determination that Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. Id. For the foregoing 19 reasons, Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of legal assistance shall be denied. 20 With regard to Plaintiff’s request for additional time to file the Second Amended 21 Complaint, good cause appearing, the findings and recommendations of July 23, 2009 shall 22 be vacated, and plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time in which to file a Second 23 Amended Complaint. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff's request for court-appointed legal assistance is DENIED; 26 2. The findings and recommendations of July 23, 2009, are VACATED; 27 28 2 1 2 3. Plaintiff is GRANTED additional time in which to file a Second Amended Complaint; 3 4 4. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint, pursuant to the court's order of November 26, 2008; and 5 6 5. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij September 18, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
