(HC) Riley v. Scribner, No. 1:2005cv00350 - Document 56 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's Fourth and Last 55 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations, signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon, Jr on 2/3/2009. Objections to F&R due by 2/17/2009. (Sondheim, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Riley v. Scribner Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALBERT LEVELL RILEY, 8 Petitioner, 9 vs. 10 A.K. SCRIBNER, 11 12 Respondent. ________________________________/ 13 1:05-CV-00350-LJO-JMD (HC) ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S FOURTH AND LAST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (DOCUMENT #55) SEVEN DAY DEADLINE Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 14 2254. On January 29, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion to extend time to file objections to the 15 findings and recommendation. 16 The Court notes that the current motion is Petitioner’s fourth motion for extension of time 17 and that Petitioner’s objections were originally due in July 2008. Furthermore, Petitioner’s cause 18 for this current motion is questionable at best–Petitioner can make copies of his objections by 19 hand if he desires a copy of his objection. While the Court grants Petitioner’s motion for a seven 20 day extension, the Court puts Petitioner on notice that this is the last extension of time the Court 21 is willing to grant Petitioner and any further delay on Petitioner’s part will result in the District 22 Judge reviewing the case without Petitioner’s objections. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time is granted 24 and Petitioner has seven (7) days from the date of service of this order in which to file objections 25 to the findings and recommendation. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: hlked6 February 3, 2009 /s/ John M. Dixon UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
