(PC) Ramirez v. Scribner, et al, No. 1:2004cv06418 - Document 137 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 131 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 67 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/29/2009. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
(PC) Ramirez v. Scribner, et al Doc. 137 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DOMINGO RAMIREZ, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:04-cv-06418-OWW-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER v. A.K. SCRIBNER, et al., (Doc. 131) 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Domingo Ramirez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has 16 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 17 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 18 On December 15, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 19 which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 20 Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. The parties have not filed 21 timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 23 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 24 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 15, 2008, is adopted in full; 27 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed March 27, 2006, is 28 DENIED. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: January 29, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.