(PC) James v. Scribner, No. 1:2004cv05878 - Document 301 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER Adopting 296 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING 295 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/19/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) James v. Scribner Doc. 301 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JOHN E. JAMES, III, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 CASE NO. 1:04-cv-05878-LJO DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. A.K. SCRIBNER, et al., 8 Defendants. (Doc. 296) 9 / 10 11 Plaintiff John E. James III, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed 12 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 13 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 14 On July 1, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which 15 was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 16 Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. On July 29, 2009, plaintiff filed 17 an Objection. 18 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a 19 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings 20 and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed July 1, 2009, is adopted in full; and 23 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunctive relief, filed June 25, 2009, is denied.IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: b9ed48 August 19, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
