(PC) James v. Scribner, No. 1:2004cv05878 - Document 273 (E.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 267 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS; Plaintiff's 257 motion for a court order, filed September 16, 2008, is denied signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/04/2009. (Flores, E)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) James v. Scribner Doc. 273 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) A.K. SCRIBNER, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) JOHN E. JAMES III, 6 7 8 9 10 CASE 1:04-cv-5878 LJO DLB PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 267) 11 12 Plaintiff John James III, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed 13 this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 14 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 15 On December 23, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein 16 which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the 17 Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. The parties have not filed 18 timely objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 19 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 20 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 21 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 23, 2008, is adopted in full; and 24 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order, filed September 16, 2008, is DENIED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: b9ed48 February 4, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
