(HC) Allen v. Calderon, No. 1:2001cv05994 - Document 81 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 76 , Denying Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Directing Clerk of Court to Enter Judgement in Favor of Respondent signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/5/2009. CASE CLOSED.(Esteves, C)

Download PDF
(HC) Allen v. Calderon Doc. 81 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ERNEST LEE ALLEN, 10 11 CV F 01-5994 LJO DLB HC Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT v. 12 ART CALDERON, 13 [Doc. 76] Respondent. 14 / 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant 16 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is represented by Carolyn D. Phillips, Esq. 17 On November 19, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that 18 the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. This Findings and Recommendation was 19 served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) 20 days of the date of service of the order. 21 On January 30, 2009, Petitioner filed timely objections to the Findings and 22 Recommendation. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 24 a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's 25 objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is 26 supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for 27 questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendation issued November 19, 2008, is ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and, 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Respondent. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 February 5, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.