(PC) Richardson v. Bryant, et al, No. 1:1999cv06575 - Document 141 (E.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 138 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 112 , 115 Motions for Default Judgment signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/9/2009. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Richardson v. Bryant, et al Doc. 141 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PATRICK RICHARDSON, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. H. L. BRYANT, et al., 14 15 Defendants. 1:99-cv-06575-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 138.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Docs. 112, 115.) _____________________________/ 16 Patrick Richardson (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. 19 On September 9, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 20 that plaintiff's motions for default judgment be denied. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file 21 objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. More than forty-five days have 22 passed, and plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and 23 recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73- 25 305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 26 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 27 analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 3 9, 2009, are ADOPTED in full; and 4 2. Plaintiff's motions for default judgment, filed on April 14, 2009 and May 26, 2009, 5 are DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: November 9, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.