Insight Psychology and Addiction Inc. v. Inpsycht Psychological Services, PC et al, No. 8:2022cv01304 - Document 29 (C.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge James V. Selna, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT against both Defendants as follows: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: Defendants, their officers, agents, servant s, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and related companies and all persons acting for, with, by, through or under them, and each of them, be permanently enjoined and restrained from: SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. in favor of Insight Psychology and Addiction Inc. against Inpsycht Psychological Services, PC, Lauren Ashley Shapiro Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment,, 26 (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Insight Psychology and Addiction Inc. v. Inpsycht Psychological Services, PC et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 Insight Psychology and Addiction Inc. d/b/a NSIGHT Psychology and Addiction, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 8:22-cv-01304-JVS-KES Hon. James V. Selna Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION v. Inpsycht Psychological Services, PC; Lauren Ashley Shapiro; and Does 1-100, Inclusive. Defendants. 20 21 The Court previously entered default judgment in favor of Plaintiff Insight 22 Psychology and Addiction Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and against Defendants Inspycht 23 Psychological Services, PC and Lauren Ashley Shapiro (“Defendants”) (Doc. 26). In its 24 Motion for Default Judgment, Plaintiff further requested that the Court enter the 25 injunctive relief requested in the Complaint. (Doc. 24 at ¶8). 26 Having considered the entire record and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules 27 of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT 28 against both Defendants as follows: 1 ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 FINAL JUDGMENT 1. On Plaintiff’s Claim for Trademark Infringement, the Court enters judgment in Plaintiff’s favor. 2. On Plaintiff’s Claim for Federal Unfair Competition, the Court enters judgment in Plaintiff’s favor. 3. On Plaintiff’s Claim for California Statutory Unfair Competition, the Court enters judgment in Plaintiff’s favor. 4. On Plaintiff’s Claim for Common Law Unfair Competition, the Court enters judgment in Plaintiff’s favor. 5. On Plaintiff’s Claim for Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations, the Court enters judgment in Plaintiff’s favor. 6. On Plaintiff’s Claim for Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage, the Court enters judgment in Plaintiff’s favor. 15 7. 16 this judgment. The Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of implanting and enforcing 17 18 PERMANENT INJUNCTION 19 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 20 1. Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, 21 subsidiaries, affiliates, and related companies and all persons acting for, with, by, 22 through or under them, and each of them, be permanently enjoined and restrained from: 23 a. using in any manner the Infringing Mark or any other trade name, 24 trademark, trade dress, or service mark that is confusingly similar to Plaintiff’s 25 NSIGHT Trademarks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, 26 marketing, advertising, or promotion of Defendants’ services; 27 28 b. using any trademark, trade dress, service mark, name, logo, design, or source designation of any kind in connection with Defendants’ services that is 2 ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1 a copy, reproduction, colorable imitation, or simulation of, or confusingly similar 2 to Plaintiff’s NSIGHT Trademarks; 3 c. using any trademark, trade dress, service mark, name, logo, design, 4 or source designation of any kind in connection with Defendants’ services that is 5 likely to cause confusion, mistake, deception, or public misunderstanding that 6 such services are provided by Plaintiff, or are sponsored or authorized by Plaintiff, 7 or are in any way connected or related to Plaintiff; 8 9 d. engaging in any activity constituting an infringement of Plaintiff’s trademark rights or otherwise unfairly competing with Plaintiff in any way; and 10 e. disclosing, reproducing, distributing, or using any of Plaintiff’s 11 confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets, or any of the confidential 12 information of Plaintiff’s patients; 13 2. Defendants be directed to remove the Infringing Mark from all locations 14 which bear the Infringing Mark, destroy any such items which bear the Infringing Mark 15 and from which the Infringing Mark cannot be removed; and 16 3. Defendants serve upon Plaintiff’s counsel within thirty (30) days of this 17 Order, a report in writing under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which 18 Defendants have complied with the requirements of this injunction. 19 20 21 22 DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at Santa Ana, California, this 27th day of March, 2023. 23 24 25 ______________________ 26 Hon. James V. Selna United States District Judge 27 28 3 ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
