Peter Moses Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al, No. 8:2021cv01628 - Document 738 (C.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, AND SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY by Judge David O. Carter. Related to: Judgment 734 . Judgment is hereby entered in this case as to Plaintiffs and the Sett lement Classes claims in accordance with the Courts April 24, 2023, Final Approval Order as to all claims against Amplify in this Action. Plaintiffs and the Settlement Classes claims against Amplify are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)

Download PDF
Peter Moses Gutierrez v. Amplify Energy Corporation et al Doc. 738 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 8 9 10 PETER MOSES GUTIERREZ, JR., et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 v. AMPLIFY ENERGY CORP., et al., Defendants. Case No. 8:21-CV-01628-DOC(JDEx) AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO AMPLIFY ENERGY CORPORATION, BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, AND SAN PEDRO BAY PIPELINE COMPANY Hon. David O. Carter 16 17 The Court having entered on April 24, 2023, a Final Approval Order 18 approving the Settlement between Plaintiffs Peter Moses Gutierrez, Jr.; John 19 Pedicini and Marysue Pedicini, individually and as Trustees of the T & G Trust; 20 Rajasekaran Wickramasekaran and Chandralekha Wickramasekaran, individually 21 and as Trustees of the Wickramasekaran Family Trust; Donald C. Brockman, 22 individually and as Trustee of the Donald C. Brockman Trust; Heidi M. Jacques, 23 individually and as Trustee of the Heidi M. Brockman Trust; LBC Seafood, Inc.; 24 Quality Sea Food Inc.; Beyond Business Incorporated, d/b/a Big Fish Bait & 25 Tackle; Josh Hernandez; John Crowe; Banzai Surf Company, LLC; Davey’s Locker 26 Sportfishing, Inc.; East Meets West Excursions; Bongos Sportfishing LLC; Bongos 27 III Sportfishing LLC; and Tyler Wayman (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Amplify 28 Energy Corporation, Beta Operating Company, LLC, and San Pedro Bay Pipeline -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 Company (collectively “Amplify”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and 2 DECREED that: 3 Judgment is hereby entered in this case as to Plaintiffs’ and the Settlement 4 Classes’ claims in accordance with the Court’s April 24, 2023, Final Approval 5 Order as to all claims against Amplify in this Action. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs’ and the Settlement Classes’ claims against Amplify are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ and the proposed classes’ claims against all other defendants in this Action remain. The Parties shall take all actions required of them by the Final Approval Order and the Settlement Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in orders separately entered by this Court on 13 any application for attorneys’ fees and expenses, any application for service awards, 14 and the Plans of Distribution submitted by Class Counsel, the Parties will bear their 15 own expenses and attorneys’ fees. 16 Without affecting the finality of this Order and the accompanying Judgment, 17 the Court reserves jurisdiction over the implementation of the Settlement, and over 18 the enforcement and administration of the Settlement Agreement, including any 19 releases in connection therewith, and any other matters related or ancillary to the 20 foregoing. 21 This document constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 54 and a separate document for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil 23 Procedure 58(a). 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 11, 2023 26 __________________ Hon. David O. Carter 27 28 -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.