United States Securties and Exchange Commission v. Jerome Kaiser, No. 8:2019mc00020 - Document 11 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO JEROME KAISER, CPA by Judge James V. Selna. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") against Defendant Kaiser for disgorgement in the amount of $15,000, plus all accrued post-order interest through the entry of this Final Judgment. 6 (SEE JUDGMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
United States Securties and Exchange Commission v. Jerome Kaiser Doc. 11 1 JS-6 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff/Applicant, 7 8 9 10 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO JEROME KAISER, CPA JEROME KAISER, CPA, Defendant/Respondent, 11 12 Case No.: 8:19-mc-00020-JVS THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff/Petitioner’s Application for an order compelling Respondent Jerome Kaiser, CPA (“Kaiser” or “Respondent”) to show cause why a judgment should not be entered against him pursuant to Section 21(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u(e)(1). It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the 22 “Commission”) against Defendant Kaiser for disgorgement in the amount of 23 $15,000, plus all accrued post-order interest through the entry of this Final 24 25 Judgment. 26 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment 27 is entered in favor of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 against Defendant Kaiser for a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $60,000, plus all accrued post-order interest through the entry of this Final Judgment. 4 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the amounts 5 awarded herein shall be subject to post-judgment interest, pursuant to § 28 U.S.C. 6 7 8 9 10 11 1961, from the date of this Final Judgment until the date all amounts owed have been paid. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide 12 detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. 13 made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at 14 15 Payment may also be http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendant may also pay by certified 16 check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the 17 Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to 18 19 20 21 Enterprise Services Center Accounts Receivable Branch 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169 22 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, 23 and name of this Court; the name of the defendant in this action; and specifying 24 25 26 27 28 that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the nonmonetary terms of the Commission’s Administrative Order rendered against 8 Defendant on April 9, 2015 are fully incorporated herein and subject to 9 enforcement through this Final Judgment. 10 11 Accordingly, it is hereby further ORDERED that: 12 (a) Defendant shall cease and desist from committing or causing any 13 violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 14 15 16 17 18 19 (the “Securities Act”) and Sections 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; (b) Pursuant to Section 8A(f) of the Securities Act and Section 21C(f) of the Exchange Act, Defendant is prohibited, for ten years following the date of entry of 20 the Commission’s Administrative Order (entered April 9, 2015), from acting as an 21 officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (c) Defendant is denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant. 1 2 3 (d) After ten years from the date of the Commission’s Administrative Order, Defendant may request that the Commission consider his reinstatement by 4 submitting an application (attention: Office of the Chief Accountant) to resume 5 appearing or practicing before the Commission as: 6 7 (1) a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation 8 or review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with 9 the Commission. Such an application must satisfy the Commission that 10 11 Kaiser’s work in his practice before the Commission will be reviewed either 12 by the independent audit committee of the public company for which he 13 works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the 14 15 Commission in this capacity; and/or 16 (2) an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the 17 Commission that: (a) Kaiser, or the public accounting firm with which he is 18 19 associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight 20 Board (“Board”) in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and 21 such registration continues to be effective; (b) Kaiser, or the registered 22 23 public accounting form with which he is associated, has been inspected by 24 the Board and that inspection did not identify any criticisms of or potential 25 defects in his or the firm’s quality control system that would indicate that he 26 27 28 will not receive appropriate supervision; (c) Kaiser has resolved all 1 2 3 disciplinary issues with the Board, and has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than reinstatement 4 by the Commission); and (d) Kaiser acknowledges his responsibility, as long 5 as he appears or practices before the Commission as an independent 6 7 accountant, to comply with all requirements of the Commission and the 8 Board, including, but not limited to, all requirements relating to registration, 9 inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control standards. 10 11 (e) The Commission will consider an application by Kaiser to resume 12 appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his state CPA license 13 is current and he has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state 14 15 boards of accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement 16 by the Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other 17 merits. The Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the 18 19 matters referenced above, any other matters relating to Kaiser’s character, integrity, 20 professional conduct, or qualifications to appear or practice before the 21 Commission. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for all purposes, including to implement and enforce the terms of this Final Judgment; and all other orders and decrees 1 2 3 which may have been or may be entered in this case, and to grant such relief as this Court may deem necessary and just. 4 It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for 5 purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy 6 7 Code, 11 U.S.C. §523, the allegations in the application are true and admitted by 8 Defendant, and further, any debt for disgorgement, civil penalty or other amounts 9 due by Defendants under this Final Judgment or any other judgment, order, 10 11 consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this 12 proceeding, is a debt for the violation of the federal securities laws or any 13 regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a)(19) of the 14 15 Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). 16 17 Dated this 25th day of October, 2019 18 ___________________________________ The Honorable James V. Selna United States District Court Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Presented by: /s/ Shuman Sohrn Shuman Sohrn (admitted pro hac vice) Attorney for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.