David Zimmer v. Charles W. Callahan, No. 8:2019cv00176 - Document 21 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the Petition is DENIED; and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (es)

Download PDF
David Zimmer v. Charles W. Callahan Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ZIMMER, 12 13 14 Case No. 2:19-cv-00176-JAK (GJS) Petitioner v. CHARLES W. CALLAHAN, 15 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all 18 documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of 19 United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 17, “Report”], and Petitioner’s Objections to 20 the Report [Dkt. 20]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to 22 which objections have been stated. 23 Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and 24 recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the 25 Petition is DENIED; and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with 26 prejudice. 27 February 8, 2021 DATE: ____________________ 28 __________________________________ JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.