Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC v. VIZIO, Inc., No. 8:2018cv01571 - Document 470 (C.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. All claims of the parties in this Action have been adjudicated or dismissed, and any remaining disputes have been found moot pursuant to Dkts. 413 and 467. VIZIO is the prevailing party. Th is order is without prejudice to VIZIO's right to seek attorneys' fees pursuant to, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 285. This order is without prejudice to VIZIO's right to seek costs pursuant to, inter alia, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). See Judgment for details. (lom)

Download PDF
Polaris PowerLED Technologies, LLC v. VIZIO, Inc. Doc. 470 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 POLARIS POWERLED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. VIZIO, INC., Defendant. 12 13 14 15 Case No. 8:18-cv-01571-JVS (DFMx) ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _ ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 8:18-cv-01571-JVS (DFMx) Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. Pursuant to Dkt. 467, judgment of non-infringement with respect to the 2 U.S. Patent No. 7,239,087 (the “’087 patent”) is entered with prejudice against 3 Plaintiff Polaris PowerLED Technologies, Inc. and in favor of Defendant VIZIO, 4 Inc. on Plaintiff’s claims for infringement of the ’087 patent. 5 2. Pursuant to Dkt. 413, judgment of non-infringement with respect to the 6 U.S. Patent No. 8,223,117 (the “’117 patent”) is entered with prejudice against 7 Plaintiff Polaris PowerLED Technologies, Inc. and in favor of Defendant VIZIO, 8 Inc. on Plaintiff’s claims for infringement of the ’117 patent. 9 3. All claims of the parties in this Action have been adjudicated or 10 dismissed, and any remaining disputes have been found moot pursuant to Dkts. 413 11 and 467. 12 4. VIZIO is the prevailing party. 13 5. This order is without prejudice to VIZIO’s right to seek attorneys’ fees 14 pursuant to, inter alia, 35 U.S.C. § 285. 15 6. This order is without prejudice to VIZIO’s right to seek costs pursuant 16 to, inter alia, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). 17 18 The Clerk is directed to enter this Judgment. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: August 24, 2020 23 24 _______________________________ Hon. Judge James V. Selna U.S. District Court Judge 25 26 27 28 ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. 8:18-cv-01571-JVS (DFMx)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.