Sara Beverly Lingard v. Nancy A. Berryhill, No. 8:2017cv01521 - Document 27 (C.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, Related to: Memorandum Opinion and Order 26 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Sara Beverly Lingard v. Nancy A. Berryhill Doc. 27 1 J S -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SARA B. L.1, an Individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. Case No.: 8:17-0 1521 ADS J UDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 14 SAUL2 , ANDREW M. Social Security, Com m issioner of 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 Plaintiff’s nam e has been partially redacted in com pliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recom m endation of the Com m ittee on Court Adm inistration and Case Managem ent of the J udicial Conference of the United States. 2 The Com plaint, and thus the docket, do not nam e the Com m issioner of the Social Security. On J une 17, 20 19, Saul becam e the Com m issioner. Thus, he is autom atically substituted as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 In accordance with the Mem orandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 26, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJ UDGED that the decision of the Com m issioner of Social Security is affirm ed, and this action is dism issed with prejudice. 5 6 DATE: March 4, 20 20 7 8 / s/ Autum n D. Spaeth THE HONORABLE AUTUMN D. SPAETH United States Magistrate J udge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
