Mahmoud Karkehabadi v. Cynthia Y. Tampkins, No. 8:2016cv01854 - Document 59 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. It is Ordered that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (sp)

Download PDF
Mahmoud Karkehabadi v. Cynthia Y. Tampkins Doc. 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAHMOUD KARKEHABADI, 12 13 14 15 Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA Y. TAMPKINS, Warden, Case No. 8:16-cv-01854-JLS-MAA ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other 18 records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 19 Magistrate Judge (“R&R”). 20 The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and 21 Recommendation, which were filed untimely on June 17, 2019. (“Objections,” 22 ECF No. 58.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court 23 has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the R&R to which Petitioner 24 specifically has objected. The Objections reiterate arguments made in Petitioner’s 25 substantive briefs (see generally ECF Nos. 1, 1-2, 55), and they lack merit for the 26 reasons set forth in the R&R. The Court finds no defect of law, fact, or logic in the 27 R&R. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, and overrules the 2 Objections. 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of 4 the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered 5 denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. 6 7 8 9 DATED: August 15, 2019 ___________________________________ JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.