Ashlee Palmer v. Pier 1 Imports US Inc. et al, No. 8:2016cv01120 - Document 43 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT 42 by Judge Josephine L. Staton (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ashlee Palmer v. Pier 1 Imports US Inc. et al Doc. 43 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ASHLEE PALMER, individually, and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 8:16 CV 01120-JLS (DFMx) FINAL JUDGMENT Date: July 13, 2018 Time: 2:30 p.m. Ctrm: 10A Ass’n to: Hon. Josephine L. Staton 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Having previously found that the parties’ Settlement Agreement meets the 25 applicable criteria for approval and having approved such settlement as fair, 26 adequate, and reasonable (ECF No. 42), the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, 27 and DECREES as follows: 28 -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. As to Plaintiff Ashlee Palmer, all claims are dismissed in their entirety 2 WITH PREJUDICE. 3 2. As to all Class Members who did not timely submit requests for exclusion 4 from the settlement, all claims as alleged in the First Amended Complaint are 5 dismissed in their entirety WITH PREJUDICE. 6 3. As to all Class Members who timely submitted requests for exclusion 7 from the settlement, all claims are dismissed in their entirety WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 8 4. As to Plaintiff and all Class Members identified in Paragraph 2 above, the 9 Settlement Agreement shall be binding and enforceable, including, but not limited to, 10 the release as set forth in Section 6.2 of the Settlement Agreement. 11 5. Each side will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees except as provided 12 by the Settlement and the Court’s Final Approval Order. 13 14 15 DATED: July 23, 2018 16 ____________________________________ Hon. Josephine L. Staton UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
