Jordan Kissel v. Code 42 Software, Inc. et al, No. 8:2015cv01936 - Document 60 (C.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT and Order of Dismissal by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES and DECREES as follows: The above-referenced action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all person except those specifically identified in Paragraph 2 below. See document for further information. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)

Download PDF
Jordan Kissel v. Code 42 Software, Inc. et al Doc. 60 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JORDAN KISSEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. CODE 42 SOFTWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 – 10, inclusive, Complaint filed: November 19, 2015 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having previously found that the parties’ Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 53- 2 4, Ex. 1) meets the applicable criteria for approval, and approved such settlement as 3 fair, adequate, and reasonable (Dkt. No. 58), the Court hereby ORDERS, 4 ADJUDGES, and DECREES as follows: 5 1. The above-referenced action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to 6 all persons except those specifically identified in Paragraph 2 below. 7 2. 8 the settlement, the above-referenced action is DISMISSED WITHOUT 9 PREJUDICE. As to the four persons who timely submitted requests for exclusion from 10 3. As to all persons except those specifically identified in Paragraph 2 11 above, the Settlement Agreement shall be binding and enforceable, including 12 but not limited to the release and covenant not to sue. The release and related 13 provisions set forth in Section VI of the Settlement Agreement are hereby 14 incorporated into this Order. 15 4. 16 the Settlement Agreement. 17 5. 18 Common Fund pursuant to the Settlement Agreement for fees and costs; and 19 6. 20 Fund pursuant to the Settlement Agreement as an incentive award based on her 21 service to, and representation of, the Class. 22 7. 23 $38,191 from the Common Fund for its costs as the Claims Administrator in 24 this action; 25 8. 26 Civil Procedure, that Final Judgment should be entered as to the entirety of this 27 action, and further finds that there is no just reason for delay in the entry of 28 Final Judgment. Accordingly, Judgment is hereby entered and this action is The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the administration of The Court confirms that $100,000 is awarded to Class Counsel from the The Court confirms that $1,000 is awarded to Plaintiff from the Common The Court confirms that JND Claims Administration shall be paid The Court finds, pursuant to Rules 54(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of -2- 1 dismissed as set forth herein. The Clerk is hereby directed to enter this Order. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 Dated: March 05, 2018 THE HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.