Donald Okada v. Mark Whitehead, No. 8:2015cv01449 - Document 316 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (see document for details). (dro)
Download PDF
Donald Okada v. Mark Whitehead Doc. 316 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SOUTHERN DIVISION 12 DONALD OKADA 13 14 15 16 Case No. 8:15-CV-01449-JLS (KESX) Plaintiff, v. FINAL JUDGMENT MARK WHITEHEAD Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 This action came on for trial on December 5, 2016, in Courtroom 10A of the 2 above-entitled Court, the Honorable Josephine L. Staton, United States District 3 Judge, presiding. Plaintiff and counter-defendant Donald Okada appeared by his 4 attorneys, Randolph Gaw and Victor Meng of Gaw | Poe LLP, and defendant and 5 counter-plaintiff Mark Whitehead appeared by his attorney, James Bryant of The 6 Cochran Firm. 7 Jury’s Special Verdict. A jury of eight persons was impaneled and sworn to 8 try the action. After a four-day trial and after deliberations, the jury returned a 9 Special Verdict on December 9, 2016 in favor of Okada and against Whitehead on 10 Okada’s claims for: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) fraud; 11 and (4) equitable indemnification, and awarded Okada $306,406.96 in contract 12 damages, $9,000 in fraud damages, $144,000 in punitive damages, and $57,000 for 13 equitable indemnification. In addition, the jury found in favor of Okada and against 14 Whitehead on Whitehead’s counterclaims for: (i) breach of contract and (ii) breach 15 of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The contents of the jury’s 16 Special Verdict, a redacted version of which was filed on December 9, 2016 as 17 Doc. 247, is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. 18 The Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. On April 4, 2017, the 19 Court issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law granting Okada’s request for 20 judgment on Whitehead’s equitable defenses, remaining counterclaims,1 and 21 request for declaratory relief and authorized the appointment of a receiver. The 22 contents of the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, which was filed 23 on April 4, 2017 as Doc. 270, is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth 24 fully herein. 25 26 27 28 1 The Court dismissed with prejudice Whitehead’s counterclaim for imposition of a constructive trust in its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, which was filed on November 4, 2016 as Doc. 85, and is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. -1- The Court’s Order Appointing Receiver. On April 17, 2017, the Court 1 2 entered the Order Appointing Receiver, which authorized the Receiver to take 3 possession, custody, and control of Rockford Investment, Inc. and all of its assets, 4 including but not limited to the Dominican Republic holding companies known as 5 the SHR SOLAR Companies and the real property in the Dominican Republic 6 known as Lions Gate. The contents of the Court’s Order Appointing Receiver, 7 which was filed on April 17, 2017 as Doc. 278, is hereby incorporated by reference 8 as if set forth fully herein. The Court’s Order Awarding Okada Attorneys’ Fees. On June 12, 2017, the 9 10 Court entered the Order Granting in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, 11 which awarded Okada $569,026.25 in attorneys’ fees and $83,013.69 in costs. The 12 contents of the Court’s order, which was filed on June 12, 2017 as ECF No 314, is 13 hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. 14 Based upon the jury’s Special Verdict, the Court’s Findings of Fact and 15 Conclusions of Law, the Order Appointing Receiver, and the Order Granting in Part 16 Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND 17 ADJUDGED, and the Court ENTERS JUDGMENT AS FOLLOWS: 1. 18 Judgment. 19 a. Judgment is entered in favor of Okada and against Whitehead on 20 Okada’s claims for (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) fraud, 21 and (4) equitable indemnification; b. Judgment is entered against Okada on Okada’s trespass claim 22 23 because Okada abandoned this claim at trial; c. Judgment is entered in favor of Okada and against Whitehead on all 24 25 of Whitehead’s counterclaims including but not limited to: (i) breach of contract; 26 (ii) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (iii) unjust 27 enrichment, (iv) imposition of a constructive trust, and (v) request for declaratory 28 relief. -2- 1 d. Whitehead is not the rightful owner of Rockford Investment, Inc. 2 (“Rockford”) and all of its assets, tangible or intangible, wherever located, which 3 include but are not limited to Dominican Republic holding companies known as 4 SHR SOLAR 24, S.r.l., SHR SOLAR 134, S.r.l., SHR SOLAR 135, S.r.l., SHR 5 SOLAR 136, S.r.l, and SHR SOLAR 137 S.r.l., (collectively, the “SHR SOLAR 6 Companies”) and their assets, which include the real property assets located in the 7 Dominican Republic as described in more detail as follows (all collectively known 8 as “Lions Gate”): 9 i. Villa No. 24 and the adjacent 4 building lots located in the 10 gated community called Sea Horse Ranch, in the town of 11 Sosua, Province of Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic. 12 ii. A building lot that measures an area of 2,619.83 square 13 meters, located within the area of Parcel No. 1-Ref-6-ref 14 Cadastral District No. 2 in Puerto Plata, property is protected 15 through the Certificate of Title No. 119 (Anot. 16), issued in 16 favor of Solar SHR, S.A. on January 27, 2003. 17 iii. A building lot that measures a surface area of 2,982.24 18 square meters, located within the area of Parcel No. 1-Ref-6- 19 Reform-D-5, Cadastral District No. 2 at Puerto Plata, 20 Registration No. 1500002331, issued on June 30, 2008, in 21 favor of Solar SHR 134, S.A. 22 iv. A piece of land that measures a surface area of 747 square 23 meters located within the area of Parcel No. 1-Ref-6-Reform- 24 D-4, Cadastral District No. 2 in Puerto Plata, Registration 25 No. 1500002330, issued on June 30, 2008 in favor of Solar 26 SHR 134, S.A. 27 28 v. A building lot that measures a surface area of 3,143.62 square meters, located within the area of Parcel No. 1-Ref-6-3- 1 Reform-D-4, Cadastral District No. 2 in Puerto Plata, 2 Registration No. 1500002329, issued on June 30, 2008 in 3 favor of Solar SHR 135, S.A. 4 vi. Parcel 1-Ref-6-Reform-D-3 of Cadastral District No. 2 in 5 Puerto Plata, which has a surface area of 3,940.79 square 6 meters, covered by Certificate of Title No. 48, issued on June 7 19, 1999 in favor of Solar SHR 136, S.A. vii. Plot No. 1-Ref-6-Reform-D-2 of Cadastral District No. 2 in 8 Puerto Plata, which has a surface area of 3,061.01 square 9 10 meters, covered in the Certificate of Title No. 81, issued on 11 June 19, 1998 in favor of Solar SHR 137, S.A. 12 e. Okada is the owner of a $950,000 interest (plus simple interest 13 accruing at a rate of 2% per annum from July 31, 2014) in Rockford and its assets, 14 including the SHR SOLAR Companies and Lions Gate, and Whitehead is the 15 owner of the remaining interest, if any. 16 f. Okada is entitled to a forced sale or foreclosure sale of Lions Gate, 17 as ordered in the Court’s Order Appointing Receiver, entered and filed on April 17, 18 2017 as Doc. 278, and entitled to receive from the proceeds of that sale an amount 19 equal to his $950,000 interest (plus simple interest accruing at a rate of 2% per 20 annum from July 31, 2014), all damages awarded to him in this action, and all 21 attorneys’ fees and costs awarded to him in this action; and 2. 22 a. contract damages awarded by the jury in the amount of 23 24 Damages. Okada shall recover from Whitehead: $306,406.96; 25 b. fraud damages awarded by the jury in the amount of $9,000; 26 c. punitive damages awarded by the jury in the amount of $144,000; 27 and 28 -4- d. equitable indemnification awarded by the jury in the amount of 1 2 $57,000. 3 3. a. take possession, custody, and control of Rockford and all its assets, 4 5 Receiver’s Power and Duties. The Receiver shall: including but not limited to the SHR SOLAR Companies and Lions Gate; b. be solely responsible for management and administration of the 6 7 ongoing rentals of Lions Gate, and shall take possession, custody, and control of all 8 accounts, books, and records relating to the rental of Lions Gate; 9 c. employ whatever measures he deems reasonable and necessary to 10 effect the private sale of Lions Gate to any third party by July 17, 2017 and, after 11 July 17, 2017, by a public auction to the highest available bidder; and d. disburse funds received from the sale of Lions Gate, Rockford, 12 13 and/or the SHR SOLAR Companies as ordered in the Court’s Order Appointing 14 Receiver, entered and filed on April 17, 2017 as Doc. 278. 15 4. a. Okada and Whitehead are ordered to execute and prepare all 16 17 Injunctions. documents, and to perform all acts, requested of them by the Receiver; 18 b. Whitehead shall immediately transfer all documents and accounts 19 relating to the rentals, management, maintenance, and upkeep of Lions Gate to the 20 Receiver. c. Whitehead, anyone working in concert with him, and any 21 22 successors shall immediately vacate Lions Gate and shall not make any further 23 attempts to occupy or reside in Lions Gate without the express written consent of 24 Okada; 25 d. Whitehead, anyone working in concert with him, and any 26 successors are enjoined from any attempt to sell or transfer Rockford, the SHR 27 SOLAR Companies, or Lions Gate; and 28 -5- 1 5. Continuing Jurisdiction. The Court expressly retains jurisdiction 2 over this action and the parties for implementing, modifying, and/or carrying out 3 the terms of this Final Judgment, to entertain any suitable application or motion for 4 additional relief within the jurisdiction of this Court, and to enforce any violation of 5 the terms of this Final Judgment. 6 7 8 6. Interest. Post-judgment interest shall run on this judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 7. Attorneys’ Fees and Costs of Suit. As the prevailing party, Okada 9 shall be awarded $569,026.25 in attorneys’ fees and $83,013.69 in costs from 10 Whitehead pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and as ordered by the Court. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED and DECREED 13 14 15 Dated: June 16, 2017 Hon. Josephine L. Staton United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.