Joseph Rodriguez Montgomery v. E Arnold, No. 8:2015cv01341 - Document 20 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of t he United States Magistrate Judge 18 . No Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
Joseph Rodriguez Montgomery v. E Arnold Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ MONTGOMERY, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 16 v. E. ARNOLD, Respondent. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV 15-1341-CJC (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 DATED: November 1, 2017 CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.