Lawrence E Tannas v. Multichip Display Inc et al, No. 8:2015cv00282 - Document 318 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lawrence E Tannas v. Multichip Display Inc et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Doc. 318 Attorneys for Plaintiff Lawrence E. Tannas, Jr., dba Tannas Electronics UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No. 8:15-cv-282 AG(JCGx) Tannas, ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT v. ) Multichip Display, Inc., ) et. al., ) ) Defendants. WHEREAS, the parties to this action are: Plaintiff, Lawrence E. Tannas, Jr., dba Tannas Electronics (“Plaintiff”); Defendant and Counterclaimant Multichip Display, Inc. (“MDI”); Defendant and Counterclaimant Donald MacIntyre (“MacIntyre”); and Defendant 1 and Counterclaimant Char Bugna (“Bugna”); WHEREAS, the pleadings which raise the issues in this action are Plaintiff’s Complaint [Dkt. 1], and Defendants’ Answer and Counterclaims [Dkt. 19]; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has asserted infringement of certain claims (“Asserted Claims”) of United States Patent Nos. 7,525,633, 7,535,547, 8,068,206, and 8,792,076 (“Asserted Patents”); 1 MDI, MacIntyre, and Bugna are referred to collectively herein as “Defendants.” 1 NEAL M. COHEN (SBN 184978) (nmc@viplawgroup.com) JAMES K. SAKAGUCHI (SBN 181010) (jks@viplawgroup.com) Vista IP Law Group LLP 100 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 900 Irvine, California 92618 JS-6 Tel: (949) 724-1849 Fax: (949) 625-8955 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Asserted Claims of the Asserted Patents, namely: Claims 1-5, 9, 13, 18-21, 26-29, and 34-36 of U.S. Patent No. 7,525,633; Claims 10-12, and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,535,547; Claims 1-3, 5, 9-11, 16-19, 21-23, 25-27, 29-32, 36-37, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 8,068,206; and Claims 7-8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,792,076 [Dkt. 259]; WHEREAS, Defendants did not prevail on any affirmative defenses or counterclaims [Dkts. 135, 171]; and WHEREAS, all claims, rights, and liabilities of all parties to this action have been adjudicated. The Court, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P Rule 54(b), enters Final Judgment as follows: 1. On Plaintiff’s claims of patent infringement, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, against Defendants jointly and severally, in the amount of $258,290.80, plus costs in the amount of _________, plus post-judgment interest according to law. 2. On Defendants’ counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, against Defendants. 3. Effective immediately, and until the last of the Asserted Patents expires, Defendants and other persons in active concert or participation with them are enjoined from any further activity that infringes any of the Asserted Claims. Such activity includes, but is not limited to: resizing displays in the United States using the method used by MacIntyre that was found to be infringing; using, selling, or offering to sell in 2 WHEREAS, Defendants have been found to infringe all of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 incorporating any such resized displays; and importing into the United States any such resized displays or any instruments incorporating any such resized displays. 4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Defendant may use, offer to sell, and/or sell in the United States, and/or import into the United States, resized displays and/or instruments incorporating resized displays, if the resized displays are resized by an authorized licensee under the Asserted Patents, and such Defendant provides a written accounting to Plaintiff within 10 days of such use, offer to sell, sale, or importation, identifying same, and detailing the source(s) of the resized displays in a manner sufficient to allow Plaintiff to audit and confirm such source(s). 3/21/18 ________________ _____________________________ DATED Honorable Andrew J. Guilford United States District Judge 3 the United States any such resized displays or any instruments
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
