Robert De Leon et al v. ServiceLink Inc et al, No. 8:2014cv02040 - Document 38 (C.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Robert De Leon et al v. ServiceLink Inc et al Doc. 38 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SOUTHERN DIVISION 8 9 ROBERT DE LEON & PATRICIA 10 VINCENT, on behalf of themselves and 11 all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 12 13 Case No. 8:14-CV-02040-JLS (RNBx) FINAL JUDGMENT v. 14 SERVICELINK, INC, FIDELITY 15 NATIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC., FIDELITY 16 NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC., BKFS 17 II SERVICES, LLC, and DOES 1-20, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 On April 25, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiffs Robert De Leon and Patricia 22 Vincent’s Motions for final approval of the class action Settlement and for final 23 approval of the requested attorneys’ fees, litigation costs, and service awards. (Final 24 Approval Order, Doc. 37.) The Court hereby finds and orders as follows: 25 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, the Class 26 Representatives, the Class Members as defined in the Settlement Agreement and 27 Defendants. 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. The Court grants final approval of class certification, for purposes of 2 settlement only, of the Class as defined in the Settlement Agreement. 3 3. The Court grants final approval of the settlement agreement, which it 4 determines to be fair, adequate, and reasonable under the circumstances. 5 4. This case is dismissed with prejudice. 6 5. Class Counsel is awarded attorneys’ fees of 25% of the gross settlement fund, 7 which amounts to an award of $387,500. The Court also awards Class Counsel 8 $12,405.50 for reimbursement of litigation costs and expenses. 9 6. Plaintiffs Robert De Leon and Patricia Vincent are each awarded an 10 enhancement award of $6,000. 11 7. Kurtzman Carson Consultants is awarded $25,000 for reasonable class 12 administration services and expenses. 13 8. The Court shall have exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over this matter for 14 the purposes of supervising the implementation, enforcement, construction, 15 administration, and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement and this Judgment. 16 9. The parties are ordered to carry out the distribution of the Gross Settlement 17 Amount as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 18 10. This document shall constitute a judgment for purposes of Rule 59 of the 19 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 20 11. Upon entry of this Judgment and the release of the Gross Settlement Amount 21 to the claims administrator in this case, Plaintiffs and Class Members shall be deemed 22 to have released all claims at issue in this lawsuit as set forth in Paragraphs 3.4 and 3.5 23 of the Settlement Agreement between the Parties. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: April 25, 2016 28 _______________________________ HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
